³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾

Once again, the issue of biosecurity is being used as an excuse to attempt to limit consumer awareness of the systemic cruelty occurring in farms and slaughterhouses across the country.

There has not been a single incident of a biosecurity hazard caused by activists, despite hundreds of investigations into farms and slaughterhouses by activists over the last 40 years.

Those investigations have revealed countless atrocities that would otherwise still be an industry secret:

• Live-baiting in the greyhound racing industry

• The maceration (blending) of live male chicks in the egg industry, because they won’t ever be able to lay eggs

• The slaughter of five-day-old male calves in the dairy industry because they won’t ever be able to produce milk, and female calves who are in excess of the farm’s needs

• The use of excruciating carbon dioxide gas chambers in all major pig slaughterhouses, previously touted by the industry as ‘humane’, and also for the killing of ‘unviable’ chicks in the broiler (meat) chicken industry, and ‘spent’ hens in the egg industry whose egg-laying has slowed

• Repeated failure of stunning methods at numerous slaughterhouses

• Routine mutilation of young piglets, lambs, goats, calves and chicks, without anaesthetic

Furthermore, factory farms are not biosecure environments. They are in almost all cases, plagued by rats, mice, birds, cats, mosquitoes, cockroaches, and all manner of disease-carrying animals, who freely come and go. An outbreak of avian influenza at a Young free range egg farm in 2013, believed to be contracted from wild ducks, spread to a nearby caged facility and led to the culling of over 400,000 farmed hens. It then also spread to a second caged egg farm.

With farms containing hundreds of thousands, sometimes millions, of animals, living in their own excrement, conditions are rife for the rapid spread of disease; it is impossible with only a handful of workers to provide individual vet care or to identify and then isolate/quarantine those affected. This is a problem inherent to intensive farming. To use it as an excuse to prevent these operations being filmed and seen by the Australian public is absurd.

It is important to note also that the Biosecurity Act, which came into effect in 2017, is already extremely aggressive:

• Imposes fines of up to $1.2mil, or imprisonment for 3 years, for individuals who trespass on farms or slaughterhouses to gather footage or protest

• Requires organisations who have footage or photographs inside farms or slaughterhouses, or even knowledge of those materials’ existence, to immediately notify authorities, preventing longer investigations or campaigns that would demonstrate the systemic nature of the issues

• Removes individuals’ right to silence when being questioned over the gathering of footage or photographs inside farms and slaughterhouses

While these amendments have been proposed in the context of recent protest actions inside factory farms and slaughterhouses across Australia, there have only been two of these incidents in NSW in recent years. One of these occurred as a result of the RSPCA refusing to assist 4000 suffering hens at a free range egg farm, who had been withheld food and water in a ‘forced moult’ to increase laying frequency, a common industry practice. The other protest incident was at a slaughterhouse, where the excuse of ‘preventing animals being killed by disease’ is surely not applicable to those who are seconds from having their throats cut.

Clearly, these protest actions are being used as a smokescreen to stem the tide of footage and photographs which have been, for many years, a source of great embarrassment and reputation damage for industries that engage in commercialised animal cruelty. Were these industries transparent and honest about what happens inside these facilities, there’d be no need for anyone to take it upon themselves to capture evidence of it.