During the COVID lockdowns, schools and universities worldwide relied on education technology – edtech – to keep students learning. They used online platforms to give lessons, mark work and send feedback, used apps to teach and introduced students to programs that let them work together on projects.
Author
Natalia Kucirkova
Professor of Reading and Children’s Development, The Open University
In the aftermath of school closures, the market for edtech has kept on growing. The value of the sector is projected to rise to (£106 billion).
The problem is that we about how effective many edtech apps or programs are – or if they .
And some effects may be negative. Some of the so-called educational apps advertised to families show many adverts to children. They may use to keep children on screens without teaching them anything new.
This technology is here to stay and will remain a significant part of how children learn – so knowing whether it works is imperative.
Assessing and addressing the quality of edtech is a significant task, especially when it is already so widely used. For edtech under development, a valuable option is to between tech developers and scientists who study learning to embed existing research and knowledge into the design.
Research consultancy firms can carry out swift assessments to provide edtech developers with information on how well what they are offering works. Transparency and integrity in the research process is vital, though, to prevent bias. Ways of ensuring this include : reporting that a study is going to take place before it happens.
Partnerships with schools could also provide . However, minimum standards of quality and ethical considerations would need to be assured before technologies are sent to schools.
Setting a standard
When it comes to edtech that is already available, what is really needed is some kind of standardised metric to assess how well it works.
But establishing minimum standards for the effect of edtech is easier said than done. There is, historically, a lack of standardised metrics for assessing educational impact within – the study of how businesses create financial returns while ensuring positive social or environmental outcomes.
Without standardisation, there are too many ways to assess edtech. A review commissioned by the of evaluation criteria and standards for edtech analysed 74 methods for assessing their quality.
Similarly, I carried out a research study with colleagues on available criteria to assess the effectiveness and efficacy of edtech produced specifically for schools. We found for evaluating whether these school-specific offerings work.
The abundance of evaluation possibilities can be confusing for edtech businesses. The multitude of options makes it difficult to ascertain the quality of their products. It is confusing to investors too, especially those who not only edtech’s return on investment but also a return on education and community.
A yardstick that establishes the minimum quality requirements for a edtech product to be used in schools is crucial to ensure technology does more good and no harm. The creation of a yardstick needs to take into account both the product quality and the process of using the technology – for diverse populations and diverse learning environments.
The independent verification of evidence , considering that any company can simply “generate” a study with the data they daily collect on users. In with colleagues, I have argued for a focus on the rigour and validity of various research types.
New initiatives, such as the , have begun to consolidate the different research approaches, standards and certifications related to evidence of edtech impact globally. Ultimately, the goal is to make it easier for schools and parents to navigate the thousands of educational apps and online platforms available.
Whether individual countries will create the legal and institutional frameworks to enforce any of the standards remains to be seen. Countries will need to select standards that suit both their economic and educational agendas. An important shift is needed so that schools can strategically select edtech they know will help children’s learning.
Natalia Kucirkova receives funding from the Norwegian Research Council and The Jacobs Foundation. She works in WiKIT AS, which is a university spin-off concerned with EdTech evidence. She is affiliated with the University of Stavanger, The Open University and University College London.
