It may soon be possible to determine which patients with a type of liver cancer called hepatocellular carcinoma would benefit from immunotherapy, according to a preclinical study by Weill Cornell Medicine investigators.
The study, published Oct. 17 in Molecular Cell, provides new insights into a pair of proteins, p62 and NBR1, and their opposing functions in regulating the interferon response in hepatic stellate cells, a critical immune component in the liver’s fight against tumors. The study demonstrates that high levels of the immune-suppressing NBR1 in these specialized cells may identify patients who are unlikely to respond to immunotherapies. It also shows that NBR1-lowering strategies help shrink tumors in animal models, suggesting a potential new therapeutic approach for the subset of patients who do not respond to immunotherapy.
“P62 and NBR1 are yin and yang,” said the study’s co-principal investigator, the ³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾r T. Hirst III Professor of Oncology in Pathology and a member of the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine. “In contrast to NBR1, if p62 is high in hepatic stellate cells, a patient is protected from cancer, but if it is low, the immune system is knocked down. If NBR1 is high, the immune system is impaired, but if NBR1 is low, the immune response increases.”
Until recently, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma had few treatment options, and those that were available extended life by only a few months. Immunotherapy has offered a new alternative for these patients and may extend their lives for up to two years.
“The liver is an organ that is tremendously immune-suppressed,” said co-principal investigator , the ³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾r T. Hirst Professor of Oncology in Pathology and a member of the Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine. “Reactivating the immune system is a very attractive approach that is now bearing fruit.”
However, not all patients respond to immunotherapy, and only a small percentage achieve long-term remission. Clinicians cannot currently predict which patients would benefit. “We need biomarkers to identify which patients will respond and who will achieve long-term survival,” she said.
Moscat and Diaz-Meco worked with co-first authors Sadaaki Nishimura and Juan F. Linares, a postdoctoral associate and an instructor, respectively, in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine, and Antoine L’Hermitte, formerly of Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, on the study.
The investigators aimed to identify biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets by studying what goes wrong in the liver’s healing mechanisms that leads to cancer. Prior research has found that levels of the tumor-suppressing protein p62 are irreversibly depressed in patients who develop hepatocellular carcinoma. The new study shows that, usually, p62 helps promote an immune response by activating a protein called STING, which pushes NBR1 out of the way, triggering an immune response that destroys tumor cells. NBR1, by contrast, promotes the breakdown of STING and blocks the immune response. Deleting NBR1 from hepatic stellate cells in mice with hepatocellular carcinoma rescues the immune response and shrinks tumors even when p62 levels remain low.
The team is now investigating how they can develop a therapy that would degrade NBR1 in patients and block it from interacting with STING. The goal is to reactivate the immune system and help increase the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Drugs that activate STING are also in development and might provide another approach to help boost the immune response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The team will also study whether knocking down NBR1 might help prevent the metastasis of many types of cancer or prevent tumors from becoming resistant to therapy.
Moscat and Diaz-Meco also plan to continue their studies of the pathways that regulate the immune response in the liver.
“If we don’t fully comprehend the molecular mechanisms regulating these processes, immunotherapy will not progress, and we won’t be able to understand why it works in some patients and not others,” Dr. Diaz-Meco said.
The research reported in this story was supported by the ³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾ Cancer Institute, part of the ³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾ Institutes of Health.
Many Weill Cornell Medicine physicians and scientists maintain relationships and collaborate with external organizations to foster scientific innovation and provide expert guidance. The institution makes these disclosures public to ensure transparency. For this information, please see profiles for and .
Bridget Kuehn is a freelance writer for Weill Cornell Medicine.