The Human Rights Committee today concluded its consideration of the fourth periodic report of the Syrian Arab Republic on how it implements the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, with Committee Experts welcoming the State party’s cooperation with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, while asking questions about the treatment of Kurdish communities and the high number of cases of enforced disappearance in the country.
A Committee Expert said the Committee welcomed the cooperation between the State party and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
Another Expert said the Committee had received information about violence against communities of Kurdish origin, frequent and ongoing detentions and ill treatment to extract confessions, in addition to forced marriages and sexual violence. Could more information be provided on the current status of persons belonging to the Kurdish and Yazidi communities? Did the State party intend to take measures to treat them equally and ensure their integration?
One Expert said since the start of the conflict, there were between 100,000 to 120,000 disappeared persons. Around 85 per cent of these were attributable to Government forces. Did the State plan to criminalise enforced disappearances as such? Was the State considering working with the independent mechanism on enforced disappearances in Syria? Did the State intend to create a national register for disappeared persons?
The delegation said that by the end of 2015, Kurdish militia and separatists supported by the United States were in the north-east of Syria. They exploited the repercussions of the terrorist war and had been taking control of natural resources, including wheat and oil. These groups had imposed their own educational programme, based on ethnic considerations specific to their Kurdish ethnicity. This had had a harmful impact on the education process, with lessons being conducted in Kurdish while the majority of the population in that area was Arab.
The delegation also said that Syrian law defined the crime of deprivation of liberty as similar to the crime of enforced disappearances. The sentence for this crime was between three to 15 years if disappearance exceeded a month. The punishment for abduction was now more stringent, resulting in life imprisonment, and even execution if it led to death, sexual assault or handicap. This had been done to mitigate these kinds of crimes. The Penal Code punished any case of arrest or imprisonment if it was not stipulated by law or did not follow a legal order.
Introducing the report, Haydar Ali Ahmad, Permanent Representative of the Syrian Arab Republic to the United Nations Office at Geneva and head of delegation, said since 2011, the Syrian Arab Republic had faced persistent attempts by a group of countries to target the State, destabilise it, and undermine the rights of its people, using military, political, media and economic means. This was accompanied by the direct aggression of the so-called international coalition that was formed and led illegally by the United States, in addition to the Israeli occupation of the Syrian Arab Golan and its continued attacks against Syria, as well as the associated targeting of civilian facilities and infrastructure. Syria was exerting all efforts to address the repercussions of war and aggression and ensure the sovereignty and independence of the country. Despite the gravity of these challenges, Syria was committed to the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, working to address challenges in its implementation and guarantee the rights and freedoms recognised in the instrument.
In concluding remarks, Mr. Ahmad thanked the Committee for the opportunity to hold a constructive dialogue on the Covenant. Some of the questions had been based on false and unfounded reports, propagated by well-known sources for political ends, to denigrate the efforts of the Syrian Arab Republic. Mr. Ahmad hoped the Committee would not believe every piece of information received and maintain an objective and impartial position. Ending unilateral coercive measures was essential to achieving human rights in the country, as was ending occupation and illegal presence on State territory.
In her concluding remarks, Tania María Abdo Rocholl, Committee Chairperson, thanked everyone who had participated in the dialogue. The Committee had discussed many different issues relating to the rights enshrined in the Covenant. The Committee was committed to ensuring that the highest level of civil and political rights was being achieved in the Syrian Arab Republic.
The delegation of Syria was made up of representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates; the Ministry of Justice; the Ministry of Interior; the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research; the Ministry of Local Administration and Environment; the Ministry of Social Affairs and Labour; the Planning and International Cooperation Commission; and the Permanent Mission of Syria to the United Nations Office at Geneva.
The Human Rights Committee’s one hundred and forty-first session is being held from 4 to 28 March 2024. All the documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, can be found on the session’s . Meeting summary releases can be found . The webcast of the Committee’s public meetings can be accessed via the UN Web TV .
The Committee will next meet in public at 3 p.m. on Monday, July 15, to begin its consideration of the fourth periodic report of India
Report
The Committee has before it the fourth periodic report of the Syrian Arab Republic
Presentation of Report
HAYDAR ALI AHMAD, Permanent Representative of the Syrian Arab Republic to the United Nations Office at Geneva and head of delegation, said since 2011, the Syrian Arab Republic had faced persistent attempts by a group of countries to target the State, destabilise it, and undermine the rights of its people, using military, political, media and economic means. Syria faced a war whose tools were terrorist armed groups, to which other countries provided financial, logistical, and media support. Terrorism had grave impacts on the full enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms, most notably the right to life. It also threatened the territorial integrity and security of States, the stability of governments, and the rule of law.
This was accompanied by the direct aggression of the so-called international coalition that was formed and led illegally by the United States, in addition to the Israeli occupation of the Syrian Arab Golan and its continued attacks against Syria, as well as the associated targeting of civilian facilities and infrastructure. Under its national duty, Syria confronted this terrorist war on several fronts and worked to restore security and stability to Syrian territories. Syria was exerting all efforts to address the repercussions of war and aggression and ensure the sovereignty and independence of the country.
Despite the gravity of these challenges, Syria was committed to the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, working to address challenges in its implementation and guarantee the rights and freedoms recognised in the instrument. The period covered by the report witnessed major legislative and institutional changes, the most prominent of which was the adoption of the 2012 Constitution. The constitutional elections were organised on time, and appropriate measures were taken to ensure participation inside and outside the country.
Syria had strengthened the general framework for the protection of the rights enshrined in the Covenant by reviewing and updating the legislative and institutional frameworks. Some institutions were reshaped, and their competences were revised, including the Supreme Constitutional Court. This involved the issuance of more than 20 amnesty decrees during the period between 2011 and 2023, from which a large number of detainees, convicts and fugitives benefited. This reflected the Syrian State’s keenness to stop the violence, and to commit to a political solution. The State was amending a number of laws aimed at ensuring equality between men and women in issues related to personal status, eliminating any discrimination against women in the Penal Code, and providing all opportunities to allow them to contribute effectively to political, economic, social and cultural life.
One of the most prominent challenges today was the decline of the rule of law at the international level, and the persistent efforts by some countries to impose their economic and political systems and social values on other countries. Some countries, through mechanisms established under the title of human rights, had continued to spread allegations to hide their destructive practices against Syria. The primary responsibility for human rights lay with the State concerned, and these efforts must be supported through international dialogue and cooperation, based on respect for international law. Syria hoped to engage in an objective, impartial and constructive dialogue with the members of the Committee.
Questions by Committee Experts
A Committee Expert said the Committee recognised that the Syrian society had been deeply stricken since the armed conflict in 2011 and more recently by the earthquake in 2023. The Committee was grateful to the State party for undertaking the dialogue. The Committee wished to hold a dialogue with the State on the basis of reliable and non-biased information. The Committee was not a tribunal or court but was here to discuss and understand how the Covenant was applied in the State party. The Committee was also aware that unilateral coercive measures applied against Syria seriously affected the population. The Covenant continued to apply in these times of instability. The Committee had prepared for the dialogue keeping the specific and difficult context of the country in mind.
Given the information on the grave and systematic violations committed on Syrian territory, what concrete steps had been taken by the State to implement a transitional justice mechanism, with its fundamental pillars of justice, reparation, truth, guarantees of non-repetition and other aspects such as memorialisation? In April 2023, United Nations Special Procedures asked Syria about the tadamon military operation which saw the execution of 280 civilians, including at least 12 children, later left a in mass grave? Like the Special Procedures, the Committee could not independently these allegations. What investigations had been carried out on this?
What were the specific obstacles to the establishment of a national human rights institute? Would the State be willing to work with the High Commissioner’s Office to implement a national reporting mechanism? How was the Covenant incorporated into Syrian domestic law? Had it had any positive influence on national legislation. What were the obstacles to ratifying the Optional Protocol on individual communications?
Another Expert said the Committee welcomed the statistical data on the number of civil servants and public officials investigated by the Central Supervisory and Inspection Commission, and the amounts recovered. What was the composition of this body? Could information be provided on court cases in which Government officials were ultimately convicted of corruption? Could the State party comment on allegations that some Government officials and some non-State armed groups had increasingly resorted to extortion, detention, drug trafficking and other illicit activities to raise funds? According to reliable sources, between August 2020 and June 2024, 4,013 cases of arbitrary detentions, 2,109 cases of forcibly disappeared persons, and 285 cases of people who died due to torture were documented. Could the delegation comment on this data?
According to the State party, a number of measures had been taken to counter the activity of terrorist organizations. Could the State party describe such measures in the areas that may interfere with human rights? The Committee had received news that since October 2020, the Anti-Terrorism Court had issued 91,000 sentences, some of them death sentences. What was the composition of the Anti-Terrorism Tribunal and how were these criminal proceedings conducted? How were they compatible with the Covenant?
A Committee Expert said the State party’s replies indicated that Syrian labour legislation did not discriminate between Syrian citizens and Syrian Kurds. However, the Committee had received information about violence against communities of Kurdish origins, frequent and ongoing detentions and ill treatment to extract confessions, in addition to forced marriages and sexual violence. Information had been received pertaining to discrimination after the earthquake, and the refusal of the Government to deliver essential aid to people living in Kurdish-majority regions. Could more information be provided on the current status of persons belonging to the Kurdish and Yazidi communities? Did the State party intend to take measures to treat them equally and ensure their integration?
Same-sex relations in the State party were criminalised and this group frequently experienced violence. Could more information be provided on efforts to protect vulnerable groups, including sexual minorities? Could information on previously tried cases of discrimination in the workplace be provided? Gender-based discrimination was not enshrined within the legal framework. There was discrimination against women when it came to passing on nationality. Could more information about the ³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾ Commission, which had been created to study discriminatory legislation against women, be provided? Had the ³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾ Commission adopted an inclusive approach involving civil society? Had this Commission issued recommendations and what kind of recommendations?
What was the status of the national plan to bolster women at all levels? Could information be provided on the draft law that criminalised domestic violence? Could more information be provided about so-called honour crimes? It seemed that the sanctions did not deter perpetrators from committing such crimes.
Responses by the Delegation
The delegation said international conventions ratified by Syria were part of the national legislation. Accession to a convention should not contradict with domestic law. The provisions of the Covenant were implemented by civil and national courts and were part of the national legislation. The issue of ending impunity had been raised by the Committee Experts. Syria, pursuant to its Constitutional obligations, had a comprehensive legal system within Syrian domestic legislation. The Penal Code criminalised acts which were considered a violation of human rights.
During the terrorist war against Syria, several laws were adopted in connection with ending impunity, including the Prevention against Torture Act. There were a number of acts or laws which sought to punish illegal offences, particularly when it came to military operations. The Syrian Armed Forces were subject to a legal system, including the Penal Code and the Code of Civil Procedures. Any person who was a victim of a crime or witnessed a crime could raise a complaint to the Prosecutor General. The decision of the public and general prosecutor was one of the temporary restrictions to enable the military to review the offences of military personnel before taking a decision.
A committee comprised of high-level officials probed into complaints committed by military personnel. There had been a decrease in the number of complaints in the last three years compared to previous years. In 2024, there had only been four complaints so far. This was related to the decreased number of military operations on the ground. There were a number of guarantees which ensured that impunity did not prevail, including in the military courts.
Mechanisms were carried out to ensure humanitarian assistance reached those who needed it. The Government had facilitated the delivery of humanitarian aid throughout the State, in all territories, including those that were hard to reach or were controlled by terrorist groups. This included medical aid, potable water, food and hygienic items. The Government had been cooperating with the United Nations to extend humanitarian aid. The main goal was to deliver humanitarian assistance to Syrians who required it without discrimination.
The Ministry of Justice had taken note of the work of the national committee in charge of studying discriminatory texts against women. The Ministry had taken note of the committee’s findings and revised several articles, and trained judges to implement them. A study was also organised on early marriage, which was a phenomenon facing Syrian society. A programme of action had been carried out on the national level to put an end to the phenomenon and address its repercussions. Some articles of the Penal Code were being amended to limit the number of early marriages. A television series and workshops had been organised to shed light on this issue.
Women had taken part in the national reconciliation process. Legislation had been reviewed regarding discrimination, including so-called honour crimes. In this case, the mitigating factor had been removed from the Syrian Constitution to subject perpetrators to the strict provisions of the law without exceptions. The Constitution was the main umbrella of legislative and executive provisions. An integrated law was being prepared to criminalise domestic violence. The unit on the protection of families was the authority which provided psychosocial and legal support to victims of domestic violence, and helped to reintegrate them into society. The Government worked to raise awareness by holding several workshops, including for law enforcement and judicial officials.
Two specialist bodies monitored corruption throughout the State. Inspections had been carried out and funds had been recovered by the State. A central supervision body carried out audits in regard to tendering. Funds were recovered in cases of serious financial misconduct. Structural reforms had been undertaken to bolster the integrity of the system. A new law was in place for the civil service which would bolster the supervisory mechanism in tackling corruption. Seven judges had been stripped of their office due to being convicted of corruption.
The Constitution established equality without any form of discrimination. Before the terrorist war against Syria, the country was proud of the mosaic of different elements of the Syrian people, which had represented a model of unity. By the end of 2015, Kurdish militia and separatists supported by the United States were in the north-east of Syria. They exploited the repercussions of the terrorist war and had been taking control of natural resources, including wheat and oil. These groups had imposed their own educational programme, based on ethnic considerations specific to their Kurdish ethnicity. This had had a harmful impact on the education process, with lessons being conducted in Kurdish while the majority of the population in that area was Arab. The Government would welcome a large number of students from areas under Kurdish control to ensure they could take exams in areas controlled by the Syrian State.
In Syria, the law on public officials and those working in the private sector promoted equality, and the freedom to work without any form of discrimination. Terrorist groups, in particular the Islamic State, had committed violations against ethnic groups, including Yazidi people. In contrast, the Syrian Government had provided extensive support to Yazidi people, ensuring they were provided with medical and psychological assistance.
A law had been in place since 1949 which criminalised all forms of violence. The law on inter-family violence aimed to protect members of the family, and targeted all forms of violence, including physical, sexual and economic violence. The State had created a unit for protection, as well as shelters. This was a unit which tackled violence in the context of the family. Though the law, a protection mechanism was created. The law would soon be promulgated.
Decrees were in place to tackle terrorism and its funding. In 2012, a law was formulated to tackle terrorism and a special Anti-Terrorism Court was created. Measures had been taken to tackle terrorist activities in Syria, ensuring terrorists had no safe haven or funding. The goal of terrorists was to sow terror. Judges of the Anti-Terrorism Court were ordinary judges who were independent. The Court of Cassation oversaw the sentences handed down by the Anti-Terrorism Court. Sentences handed down were variable and related to ammunition and explosives.
Questions by Committee Experts
A Committee Expert asked about the legislative reforms regarding women. Could the rules of nationality transmission from Syrian women to their children be clarified? Could the delegation respond to the question regarding the case of the execution of 280 civilians?
One Committee Expert saluted Damascus and hoped Syria would achieve peace and stability as soon as possible. What measures were being taken to protect civilians against death, injuries and secret killings in conflict areas? How were they guaranteed effective access to humanitarian aid. How could civilians prevent the intrusion of the armed conflict in their daily lives? Could information be provided on transparent investigations undertaken on all violations of human rights allegedly committed by any party to the conflict since 2011?
How many complaints had been received, related investigations and prosecutions conducted, and reparations granted? Was there an official register to record the numbers of victims of civilian casualties in the context of the internal conflict? Regarding the earthquake of 2023, what were the number of casualties? What measures had been taken to provide humanitarian assistance to victims? Could statistics about rehabilitation in a post-crisis period be provided? How were humanitarian convoys protected?
The death penalty was a major issue covered by the Covenant. What steps had been taken to revise current legislation to ensure the death penalty was authorised only for the most serious crimes? How many death penalty sentences had been applied? Pardon decrees had been issued between 2011 and 2020. Could information be provided about these decrees and the circumstances surrounding their issuance? What were the criteria which governed the selection of those benefitting from pardon? Did the State party intend to consider ascension to the Second Optional Protocol or consider a moratorium of the death penalty?
Another Expert said since the start of the conflict, there were between 100,000 to 120,000 disappeared persons. Around 85 per cent of these were attributable to Government forces. Did the State plan to criminalise enforced disappearances as such? The domestic law on kidnapping was not appropriate or enough. Was the State considering working with the independent mechanism on enforced disappearances in Syria? Did the State intend to create a national register for disappeared persons? In 2014, a bureau for disappeared persons had been set up as well as a department for martyrs. Could more information be provided on how these mechanisms worked?
The Committee welcomed the cooperation between the State party and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Could the State share updated statistical data on internally displaced persons and persons who had to flee the country? Was there a lasting sustainable return policy set up by the State? Could the delegation clarify the reconciliation process that was being considered to ensure people could return? What special protection measures for internally displaced persons had been adopted by the State? Residents who wanted to return home allegedly needed to obtain several clearances, including in regard to their house. Was this true? How was this in line with the Covenant?
Another Expert said the Committee welcomed the introduction of the new anti-torture law as a legislative step towards complying with international standards. However, the certainty of punishment for perpetrators was questionable. The article lacked clear investigative mechanisms. How did the State party ensure prompt and thorough investigations by an independent mechanism into all allegations of ill treatment? How did the State party intend to offer redress to past victims of torture? What measures would the State party take to prevent torture in detention centres and prisons in the future? What was being done to establish an oversight mechanism?
Torture was reportedly so widespread that the International Court of Justice had issued an order for provisional measures in November 2023. The Committee had received information that at least 285 individuals had died due to torture, with 29 deaths occurring after the Court issued its order. How were these statistics produced? Would the State party allow independent monitors access to the country’s detention centres? What measures was Syria taking to prevent torture, particularly in light of the International Court of Justice’s order regarding provisional measures?
Another Committee Expert said the Committee had received reliable information concerning widespread arbitrary detentions and secret detention centres, some of which were under the control of the State. What measures had been adopted to prevent such acts in law and in practice, and to guarantee that detained persons were free to access a defence counsel, to be informed of their rights, to contact a relative, and to have access to independent medical examinations? What were the guarantees that persons subjected to illegal or arbitrary detention could report such violations and were provided with effective judicial remedies? What was the legally maximum duration of police custody and pretrial detention?
Some reports from reliable sources had deplored the harsh and extremely poor conditions in prisons, including overcrowding, lack of sanitation, malnutrition and lack of medical care. What measures were being taken by the State party to improve the conditions of civilian and military prisons? What services were provided to women with infants in prisons? Could more information be provided on detainees who had died in prison? Were family members informed of their deaths and did they receive the bodies in a dignified manner? What measures had been taken to manage COVID-19 in prisons?
Had the bill on illegal immigration been promulgated and put into effect? What was its impact on the ground? There had been allegations that the Government did not protect children from forcible recruitment and use as soldiers. What activities were being carried out to implement the national plan 2023-2026, including on raising awareness, capacity building, and training relevant officials? Had a mechanism been established to receive victims’ complaints? The Committee appreciated that the State party had set up institutional cooperation with regional and international organizations working in the field. Could more information be provided?
A Committee Expert asked if the State party would prepare a comprehensive law to combat discrimination? Had a debate been organised on equality in terms of Christians, Muslims and Jewish people around personal status and an open interpretation of Islamic Sharia law? The Committee had received information that those returning to the country suffered from a range of violence, including sexual violence against women and children. There was a need to collaborate with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to address the situation of refugees and asylum seekers. To what extent did Syria intend to collaborate with the regional office to develop a protection system for refugees?
Responses by the Delegation
The delegation said that in 2019, a national commission was established to consider the promulgation of laws. Guidelines were developed and circulated amongst ministries, which included outlines on drafting. When developing a law, it was important that they aligned with international treaties which were ratified by the State. Training on this had been conducted for all parties. All departments which prepared legislation were committed to these guidelines. Investigations and follow-up of investigations were the responsibility of judges. Some authorities had no right to investigate, and were required to obtain an authorisation from the Public Prosecutor. A decree authorised certain measures for seven days under the General Prosecutor.
Syrian law defined the crime of deprivation of liberty as similar to the crime of enforced disappearances. The sentence for this crime was between three to 15 years if disappearance exceeded a month. The punishment for abduction was now more stringent, resulting in life imprisonment, and even execution if it led to death, sexual assault or handicap. This had been done to mitigate these kinds of crimes. The Penal Code punished any case of arrest or imprisonment if it was not stipulated by law or did not follow a legal order. Any authority or prison centre was punished for accepting anyone without relevant documentation. Deterrent punishments had been issued to combat the crime of depriving people of their freedoms. A decree was issued in 2024 which authorised the supervision of detention centres and prisons periodically.
The State party stressed the responsibility of Syrian State authorities when it came to investigating cases of enforced disappearances.
The Syrian Penal Code included texts which addressed torture or the use of harsh treatment. The law on torture had put together all relevant aspects under one law and had set clear definitions which were compatible with the Convention against Torture, which Syria had acceded to in 2004. The definition of torture had been expanded to include torture committed by terrorist groups. Syria had several legal texts on civil and criminal procedures which regulated mechanisms, from the point a person was arrested, through to investigations by judges, and up to the court procedures. These included guarantees on providing detainees a lawyer and information about their charges. Compensation for crimes of torture could be provided, following an order from a judge. Several cases were before the Syrian judiciary relating to the use of force during investigations. Decisions would be taken in due course once the legal procedures were finalised.
Execution should only be carried out in exceptionally rare circumstances, for instance in severe cases, including premeditated murder, rape of children, and violence which led to death. This sentence could only be issued in the presence of the person and a lawyer. Cases involving the death sentence followed due process and allowed for possible amnesty if necessary. A death sentence was automatically referred to the court of appeal. Sometimes, death sentences were replaced with life imprisonment. Many death sentences had not been implemented, but were commuted. In 2022, seven sentences were implemented.
Syria had a national and constitutional responsibility to protect its citizens. Steps had been taken to ensure the safety of civilians since the events of 2011. Orders had been given to the Syrian armed forces to take every measure to protect civilians during military operations, particularly women and children. Information sessions had been organised with international organizations to train the armed forces and the police, and to ensure they respected international humanitarian law.
The Government ensured safe evacuation corridors from terrorist groups in areas where armed groups were located. Shelters were established for citizens who fled terrorist groups. The Government had issued documents for those who had left their documents behind in flight. Classes had been organised for children and a curriculum had been established, which aimed to recompense children for classes they lost in areas controlled by terrorist groups. Working with partners such as the United Nations Children’s Fund, operations had been carried out to clear areas of explosives.
Syria had done its best to ensure that core services continued. The State had created humanitarian aid chains which delivered to areas. The verifications on property were done to ensure that people did not move into property that did not belong to them. Residents’ authorisation did not exist. In cases where amnesty was declared, this was rolled out across the country and in all prisons. Since 2011, there had been 23 cases of amnesty, with the most recent one being granted in 2023. Objective criteria were used to determine amnesty.
A decree was published which stipulated that all crimes included in the notion of terrorism were eligible for amnesty, with the exception of those which led to deaths of individuals. If someone was suffering from a chronic illness, a medical committee would review their case, and they could be eligible for amnesty. These measures had been useful in alleviating the overcrowding of prisons.
