There is evidence that a growing number of Australians cannot afford to access enough nutritious food.
Around were severely food insecure in 2022, meaning that they ran out of food at times and could not afford to buy more. This represents a in severe food insecurity in Victoria in two years.
As shocks to Australia’s food systems increase – including natural disasters and international wars – governments need to plan for resilient food systems and should be held accountable for ensuring the right to adequate food.
Governments have for actions to support a range of human needs including housing, water, energy, education, health and employment.
However, has found that there is no clear responsibility or accountability at any level of government in Australia for one of the most basic human needs – access to adequate food.
There is a narrative in Australia that we are a because we . But is about more than how much food we produce. It is about people’s ability to access the food available in our food supply.
Australia’s food security problem
Reporting of food insecurity in Australia is infrequent and tends to underestimate the extent of the problem.
Measuring the proportion of adults who run out of food does not capture children who are food insecure or people who need to take steps to avoid running out of food, including skipping meals and buying cheaper, less healthy food.
The issue of food insecurity is complex, but it has its roots in poverty. It is exacerbated by rising food prices and other cost of living pressures.
More frequent and severe shocks to food systems are and contributing to rising food prices. This includes local shocks due to climate change – including floods, fire and drought – as well as global shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Shocks to food systems are likely to . All levels of government need to plan to make food systems more resilient to shocks in collaboration with other stakeholders.
Planning resilient food systems
Food resilience planning involves taking actions to strengthen the resilience of food systems to shocks. A food system includes all the activities, organisations and infrastructure involved in feeding people from farm to fork, and a shock – such as a bushfire or flood – can have impacts at all stages of food systems.
Food resilience planning can take place at multiple scales – national, regional and local.
The US Department of Agriculture undertook a of the resilience of food supply chains in 2020. Cities are also beginning to plan for resilient food systems, including Boston, and Toronto in North America, and in New Zealand.
This can include actions to strengthen local and regional food supply chains by growing more food locally, connecting farmers directly to local consumers and businesses, investing in local food processing and distribution and planning for a wide range of food retail stores, including public markets and independent stores.
Actions taken by many different government departments influence the resilience of food systems, so food resilience planning requires a coordinated ‘whole of government’ approach to ensuring that everyone has access to adequate food, even during shocks.
Access to adequate food is a human right
Access to adequate food is a human right under international law, which is included in the (ICESCR). It is the right to have ongoing access to food that is nutritious, culturally acceptable and sustainably produced.
The Australian Government has and has obligations to realise the right to food.
The main approach to addressing food insecurity in Australia is emergency food relief. Food relief is provided by charities, using surplus food donated to food banks by supermarkets and food manufacturers.
Many people experiencing food insecurity do not seek food relief due to . The right to food emphasises through dignified means, rather than the right to be fed through food relief.
‘Food with dignity’ approaches give people control over their own food choices. The Australian Government can implement a ‘food with dignity’ approach by setting social welfare payments at a level that supports access to a healthy diet, and state governments can introduce universal access to free school meals.
Governments can also support and social supermarkets that provide low-cost food in social settings, and that enable people to grow their own food.
Governments need to be accountable for food security
The Australian Government has obligations to realise the right to adequate food in cooperation with states and territories, but responsibilities for ensuring access to adequate food are unclear at all levels of government.
The right to adequate food has not been legislated at the federal or state level, so governments cannot be held to account under Australian law for failing to ensure the right to food.
The Australian Human Rights Commission has proposed that the right to food should be included in a federal Human Rights Act as part of the right to an adequate standard of living.
States could also include the right to food in state charters of human rights, such as Victoria’s .
As shocks to food systems increase, governments need to lead the planning for resilient food systems and tackling rising food insecurity.
This was recognised in the from the parliamentary Inquiry into food security in Australia, which recommended appointing a federal Minister for Food and the development of a ³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾ Food Plan.
The Victorian Government also has an opportunity to consider a strong legislative framework for food security and implementation of the human right to food during its which is due to report in November 2024.
Only through government leadership can this most basic human right be realised.
For more information on work by the Foodprint Melbourne research group visit their .
