At the moment in Australia, it can feel like hardly a week goes by without reports of yet another trying to influence public debates.
Currently, much of it concerns Australia’s upcoming .
Most recently, false claims about the alleged length of the Uluru Statement circulated on and offline, which were described by supporters of the Voice as .
Various politicians and political commentators repeated the claims that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is a 26-page document – despite the fact that the single-page signed document has been available online for seven years.
And it’s not the first, or the last, time we’re likely to see an example like this.
– that is, the spreading of false information without the intent to deceive – and it’s more malicious partner, – or knowingly spreading false information designed to deliberately mislead and influence public opinion – have rapidly become mainstays in modern public discourse.
But how is the spread of misinformation impacting our society, and the capacity of those charged with governing it at the most local, connected level – cities?
The distribution of disinformation and misinformation are nothing new in cities around the world, with a long history of inaccurate information.
But disinformation is not just untruths or differences of opinion, it’s a deliberate effort to spread falsehoods to meet a desired outcome, in other words, to intentionally mislead.
It’s a tool that has been used throughout history, often to the detriment of society, from to various and, more recently, .
Many of us have watched the rapid expansion of disinformation, both online and offline, in recent years – and, in many cases, how this manifested in the physical world.
We’ve seen and , and a whole sequence of false claims leading to the .
Even in our own personal circles, some of us may have had conversations we’d never have imagined with people we know – whether they’re followers of conspiracy groups or have simply bought into a beguiling narrative targeting migration, gender diversity or even urban planning.
Over the past decade, disinformation has exploded in both prevalence and impact which has led to many attempts to combat it.
There’s the genesis of a new scholarly field in 2016 of . In Australia, the Electoral Commission has established , the government is readying new laws to empower regulators to , and the country’s national broadcaster, the ABC, has established their .
And yet the spread of disinformation continues and does not look like slowing down.
When it comes to where – in cities – the people responsible for our urban governance – both elected representatives and city officials – are also increasingly faced with the consequences of concerted disinformation campaigns.
Disinformation campaigns in this context have very real consequences. They erode a city’s capacity to address urgent collective challenges – whether it’s tackling climate change, strengthening public health or promoting community cohesion to name only a few.
Let’s take a look at the case of the .
This was a seemingly innocuous and uncontroversial planning framework designed to allow residents to access their basic services – everything from workplaces, shops, parks, schools and healthcare – within a 15-minute walk or cycle of their homes.
This fairly simple idea to reduce traffic and emissions led to protests around the world – and even escalated into death threats to and accusations of .
Similarly, the United Nations’ 23-year-old, non-binding on sustainable development has become a flashpoint for some who perceive it as “linchpin in a plot to subjugate humanity”. In fact, some groups in the US have even successfully lobbied for the .
But disinformation is not limited to sustainability and climate action. It can seemingly target any issue of public significance with prominent disinformation campaigns on , and among many other examples.
And its impact can be far-reaching – both locally and internationally.
City councils are experiencing this in direct and indirect ways. Groups have stormed council chambers and threatened staff and elected representatives, , and . Anecdotally, council reports have been delayed or shelved, and critical community work has suffered.
It is impacting governance, individuals, organisations and communities. Disinformation sows distrust and division in communities, and cities are the level of government closest and most accessible to the community.
City leaders – and indeed staff at all levels – are navigating unprecedented territory in responding. Leading into local government elections next year in Victoria and New South Wales, disinformation looks as though it may play a more significant role than ever before, and many in the sector are bracing themselves.
Our team at the recently with and for local governments to constructively and effectively respond to disinformation in their specific city without undermining democratic rights and community engagement – or silencing dissent in parts of the local community.
We will bring together city officials in Australia and abroad, multidisciplinary Melbourne Centre for Cities researchers, and experts in disinformation in its various forms from across the world. The co-design process will involve three workshops in early 2024, and to participate in this process are currently open.
The playbook is a precursor to a larger research project led by the University of Melbourne in collaboration with colleagues from , , and the , that aims to interrogate the impact disinformation has on our cities and how we can work collectively – locally and globally – to best respond.
Disinformation in the city provides yet another example of the global connectedness of cities, urban governance and how much we expect of modern city governments in responding to these challenges.
It’s a timely reminder of the importance of universities and governments working together to understand and respond to complex societal challenges. And it seems that responding to disinformation in all facets of our lives is one challenge that’s likely to continue in our modern reality.
