Working Group to Review the Human Rights Records in 12 States marking end of third UPR cycle
GENEVA (19 January 2022) — The fortieth session of the Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Working Group will be held in Geneva from 24 January to 3 February, during which 12 States are scheduled to have their human rights records examined through this unique process. With the completion of this session, the third cycle of the UPR, during which all 193 UN member States will have had their human rights records reviewed, will be concluded.
The group of States to be reviewed by the UPR Working Group during this session are (in order of scheduled review): Togo, the Syrian Arab Republic, Iceland, Venezuela the Bolivarian Republic of), Zimbabwe, Lithuania, Uganda, Timor Leste, Moldova (the Republic of), South Sudan, Haiti and Sudan. The meeting will take place in Room 20 at the Palais des Nations in Geneva and will be live.
Due to COVID-19 restrictions, the meeting will be held using a combination of in-person and remote participation. In addition, no side events will be held at the Palais des Nations. Moreover, due to restrictions on the number of participants allowed inside the room, the media is encouraged to follow the proceedings on the webcast.
High-level delegations representing the 12 countries are scheduled to address the Working Group, which comprises the entire of the 47-member Human Rights Council, and other UN member or non-member State wishing to take part. Statements by heads and members of the various delegations will either be pre-recorded video messages or live links through WebEx. Some 100 States, on average, make recommendations to each State under Review (SuR). SuRs are expected to present efforts to fulfil their human rights obligations and commitments, particularly since their last UPR review, assessing positive developments and identifying challenges. The timetable of State reviews and adoption and distribution of reports can be found below and .
The fortieth session of the UPR Working Group marks the thirteenth held during the third UPR cycle. With the holding of this session, the third cycle, which started on 1 May 2017, will conclude following the successful review of all 193 UN member States. During the third UPR cycle, which is focused on implementation and follow up, States are expected to spell out steps they have taken to implement recommendations received during their previous reviews, in particular those which enjoyed their support, as well as present developments that occurred since the previous review and share challenges in their follow-up action. The serving as the basis for these reviews are available online.
During the session, an interactive dialogue between the country under review and the Working Group takes place. Each country review lasts three and one-half hours, and an additional half-hour for each country will be devoted to adopting the recommendations put forward by their peers. The review for each State is facilitated by groups of three Council members from different regional groups, or troikas, who act as rapporteurs. The for States to be reviewed during the session were selected through a drawing of lots on 12 January 2022 during an organizational meeting of the Council.
The final outcome of the fortieth session will be adopted by the plenary of the Human Rights Council at its fiftieth regular session taking place in June/July 2022.
About the Universal Periodic Review
General Assembly resolution of 15 March 2006, which created the Human Rights Council, mandated the Council to “undertake a universal periodic review, based on objective and reliable information, of the fulfilment by each State of its human rights obligations and commitments in a manner which ensures universality of coverage and equal treatment with respect to all States. Subsequently, the Universal Periodic Review mechanism was established through the adoption by the Council of its “institution-building package” – HRC – on 18 June 2007, one year after its first meeting.
The UPR Working Group consequently held its inaugural session in April 2008 for the first group of States, the order of which was decided through the drawing of lots. With the holding of this first session, the first cycle took off through which all 193 United Nations Member States have had their human rights records reviewed (April 2008 to October 2011). Subsequently, all 193 States underwent a follow-up review during the second UPR cycle (January 2012 to November 2016). With the holding of the 27th session of the UPR Working Group in May 2017, the commenced.
Per Human Rights Council resolution adopted on 25 March 2011 and decision pertaining to the review of the Council, the second and subsequent cycles of the UPR should focus on, among other things, the implementation of the accepted recommendations and the developments of the human rights situation in the State under review.
With the third UPR cycle well underway, the OHCHR has been provided with an opportunity to strengthen the engagement with all States on the follow-up and implementation of international human rights mechanisms’ outcomes, in particular those of the UPR, through cooperative efforts and sharing of best practices among States and stakeholders.
Given increasing requests for assistance under the Voluntary Fund for UPR Implementation (see please documents and ), three were held in Africa in 2018 (Uganda, Senegal and Cape Verde) and one in Latin America in 2019 (Panama) on good practices of implementation in the context of the 3rd cycle of the UPR linked to the Sustainable Development Goals (see please emerging good practices as contained in High Commissioner’s report ).
The implementation of UPR recommendations aims to strengthen national human rights protection systems – not least through a greater engagement of and other national stakeholders, including NHRIs and NGOs, and in addressing the root causes of human rights violations, and as such, has a preventive effect.
The High Commissioner for Human Rights sent to foreign ministers of States upon the adoption of their third cycle reviews encouraging their continued engagement in achieving concrete results, especially on the recommendations they have supported; 112 such letters are available online. A matrix of clustered UPR recommendations supported and or noted by the member State is , together with infographics on trends between the second and third cycle and the link between human rights recommendations and the SDGs.
It may be recalled that the Human Rights Council held a high-level on 26 February 2018 session where participants focussed on challenges and opportunities in implementing UPR recommendations in view of strengthening the promotion and protection of human rights at the national level fully integrated with the efforts at the Sustainable Development Goals ().
On 24 February 2020, the Secretary-General’s , called for “practical guidance [to be issued] to every UN country leader around the world to strengthen our platforms of cooperation to address human rights challenges utilizing the power and potential of the Universal Periodic Review.” The UPR Practical Guidance is since September 2020 available in all UN languages: [ | | | | | ]
In addition, the Secretary-General’s report on issued on 10 September 2021 cited the UPR as a model “to encourage mutual accountability” in strengthening effective multilateral legal frameworks (paragraph 107).
UPR Reporting and Objectives
Under the Council’s “institution-building package,” and as reinforced by the outcome of the Council’s review adopted in March 2011, State reviews are based on: information prepared by the State concerned (³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾ Report), submitted by the State and presented orally during the review; information contained in the reports of treaty bodies, Special Procedures, and other relevant UN mechanisms and entities (UN Compilation) to be compiled in a report by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR); and information provided by other relevant stakeholders to the UPR including non-governmental organizations, national human rights institutions, human rights defenders, academic institutions research institutes, regional organizations, also to be summarized by OHCHR in a separate document (Summary of Stakeholders). In order to strengthen the role of Parliaments and other stakeholders in all phases of the UPR, TIPs have been issued in close cooperation with the IPU, GANHRI and UPR Info respectively. They are available at:
UPR Tips for Parliaments:
UPR Tips for NHRIs and NGOs:
Per the adopted institution-building package, the objectives of the Universal Periodic Review are the improvement of the human rights situation on the ground; fulfilment of the State’s human rights obligations and commitments and assessment of positive developments and challenges faced by the State; the enhancement of the State’s capacity and of technical assistance, in consultation with, and with the consent of, the State concerned; the sharing of best practice among States and other stakeholders; support for cooperation in the promotion and protection of human rights; and, the encouragement of full cooperation and engagement with the Council, other human rights bodies and OHCHR.
Timetable for the Universal Periodic Review Working Group 40th Session:
(Contains links to the documentation page for each State)
Monday, 24 January
09h00 – 12h30 Review of
14h30 – 18h00 Review of
Tuesday, 25 January
09h00 – 12h30 Review of
14h30 – 18h00 Review of
Wednesday, 26 January
09h00 – 12h30 Review of
14h30 – 18h00 Review of
Thursday, 27 January
09h00 – 12h30 Review of
14h30 – 18h00 Review of
Friday, 28 January
09h00 – 12h30 Review of
15h00 – 18h00 Adoption of recommendations on Togo, the Syrian Arab Republic, Iceland, Venezuela (the Bolivarian Republic of) and Zimbabwe
Monday, 31 January
9h00 – 12h30 Review of
14h30 – 18h00 Review of
Tuesday, 1 February
09h00 – 12h30 Review of
16h00 – 18h00 Adoption of recommendations on Lithuania, Uganda, Timor Leste and Moldova (the Republic of).
Wednesday, 2 February
No meetings
Thursday, 3 February
16h30 – 18h00 Adoption of recommendations on South Sudan, Haiti and Sudan.
