More than 80% of global land area needed to maintain human well-being and meet biodiversity targets is at risk of conflict with human development, according to a new study led by the .
The study, , found that roughly half of global land, excluding Antarctica, provides nearly all current levels of nature’s services to people while also conserving biodiversity for 27,000 species of birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Of that, only 18% is adequately protected, the study found.
“Biodiversity, climate and sustainable development cannot be considered in isolation,” said lead author Rachel Neugarten, a doctoral student at the Cornell Lab. “We must also factor in nature’s contributions to human well-being, including clean water, carbon storage, crop pollination, flood mitigation, coastal protection and more.”
These findings point to potential conflict because 37% of the land areas that provide nature’s services are also highly suitable for development by agriculture, renewable energy, oil and gas, mining or urban expansion. The potential for development, coupled with the fact that few priority areas are currently protected, means that successful conservation will require creative solutions, such as sustainable use and multifunctional landscape planning.
“We face enormous challenges,” said senior author , the Garvin Professor and Senior Director of the Center for Avian Population Studies at the Cornell Lab. “With limited resources available to address climate change, biodiversity loss, poverty and water insecurity, we must be strategic and find ways to tackle more than one challenge at a time.”
This study is based on a global-scale optimization of land uses to identify joint priorities for biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people.
“If designed carefully, renewable energy development can be compatible with biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services to people,” Neugarten said. “Examples of this include livestock grazing under wind farms or cultivating native pollinator gardens under solar panels. But there’s a real risk that achieving renewable energy goals could conflict with nature conservation goals without careful planning.”
The research was funded by Cornell University; the Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Betty and Gordon Moore; Conservation International; the Natural Capital Project; SPRING; John and Jody Arnhold; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Nature Conservancy of Canada; The Nature Conservancy; the Liber Ero Fellowship; One Earth; and the ³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾ Science Foundation.
Pat Leonard is a writer for the Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
