The combination of a novel blood test and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can reduce overdiagnosis of low-risk cancers as well as societal costs in prostate cancer screening, according to a cost-effectiveness study from Karolinska Institutet published in the journal European Urology. The results provide support for organised prostate cancer testing in Sweden, researchers say.
A barrier to the introduction of nationwide prostate cancer screening has been that PSA (prostate-specific antigen) tests combined with traditional biopsies result in the detection of numerous minor low-risk tumours. MRI has been shown to reduce this overdiagnosis but presents a challenge due to limited health resources.
Further reduction in MRI
The STHLM3MRI trial has previously shown that a blood test called Stockholm3, developed by researchers at Karolinska Institutet, for a single screening occasion. Now, the same research group reports that this combination is also considered cost-effective in Sweden compared with both no screening and PSA test in MRI-based screening.
“Our latest results show that using Stockholm3 reduces the number of MRIs over a lifetime by 60 per cent. This also avoids unnecessary biopsies by 9 per cent, which reduces the overdiagnosis of low-risk cancers,” says , associate professor at the , Karolinska Institutet, who is responsible for the cost-effectiveness study.
The analysis predicted that MRI-based screening combined with PSA or Stockholm3 would reduce prostate cancer-related deaths by 7-9 per cent over a lifetime compared with no screening at all. The health economic evaluation showed that, compared with no screening, screening with PSA followed by Stockholm3 and MRI in high-risk individuals is classified as a moderate cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained as defined by the Swedish ³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾ Board of Health and Welfare. Furthermore, PSA combined with MRI is classified as a very high cost per QALY gained compared with Stockholm3 combined with MRI.
Support for OPT in Sweden
“This new combination with Stockholm3 can save healthcare resources and reduce societal costs while maintaining the health benefits from early detection of prostate cancer. This presents an interesting option for prostate cancer screening in Sweden,” says , PhD student at the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet and the first author of the study.
Several regions in Sweden have started to plan and implement pilot projects for organised prostate cancer testing (OPT) through the regional cancer centres. The ³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾ OPT Working Group has recommended that the OPT pilots investigate the use of different strategies for prostate cancer screening.
“Our evidence provides support for using Stockholm3 as an additional test in MRI-based screening, which could be evaluated through one of the OPT pilots,” says , associate professor of urology at the at Karolinska Institutet, who is the principal investigator for the STHLM3MRI trial and a co-author of the cost-effectiveness study.
Wider application to other countries
The current health economic evaluation is specific to Sweden, but the simulation model used in this study is open source and can be readily adapted to assess the use of Stockholm3 and MRI in other countries. The Stockholm3 test is available for clinical use in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Spain and Germany, and will be made available in additional European countries in 2022.
The research was financed by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish e-Science Research Centre (SeRC), the Swedish Prostate Cancer Federation, Karolinska Institutet and The Swedish Cancer Society. One of the co-authors, Henrik Grönberg, has five prostate cancer diagnostic-related patents pending. Another co-author, Martin Eklund, is named on four of these patent applications. Karolinska Institutet collaborates with A3P Biomedical in developing the technology for the Stockholm3 test. Henrik Grönberg, Martin Eklund and Tobias Nordström own shares in A3P Biomedical.
Publication
. S. Hao, E. Heintz, E. Östensson, A. Discacciati, F. Jäderling, H. Grönberg, M. Eklund, T. Nordström, M. Clements. European Urology, online 26 January 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.021.
