³Ô¹ÏÍøÕ¾

Less than 1% of the who travelled to work on Census Day in 2021 rode a bicycle to get there.

Bicycles are readily available and affordable. Cycling also supports .

Yet this form of transport in Australia. The number of people cycling to work between 2016 and 2021.

So, on , we ask why is this form of transport so undervalued and neglected?

We offer the following ideas about what needs to happen so more of us use bicycles for everyday transport.

1. Improve cycling infrastructure across our cities

Remember the and how quickly many of them vanished? With multiple local and state governments managing roads across the country, we have no way of knowing where all the painted or separated cycling lanes currently exist.

is needed to increase the use of bicycles for transport. At present we don’t understand how well, safely and equitably cycling routes connect up across Australian cities.

2. Use AI to help fill the gaps

(AI) methods can help pinpoint areas with limited or no cycling infrastructure across the nation. The will lead a new to trial this technology.

AI could help governments identify neighbourhoods lacking cycling infrastructure and end-of-trip facilities, street signs, measure cycling participation and monitor cycling lanes to ensure they’re well marked and maintained. Deep-learning AI is already used to improve . It has huge potential to support detailed, cost-effective, real-time identification, management and maintenance of cycling infrastructure.

A big advantage of AI is it can be . Once trained, AI models can be replicated across many neighbourhoods to identify urban design features that support cycling. It’s even more useful when combined with and , as we plan to do.

This AI technology requires high-resolution satellite imagery and spatial data to identify objects and features. Imagery collected by organisations such as Australia Post, transport departments and road maintenance companies would be perfect for AI analysis. We welcome approaches from potential industry partners for our project.

3. Use simulations to evaluate decisions on cycling

Our cities are growing fast. This creates many challenges, including climate change, traffic congestion, air quality and health. To tackle these challenges, we need evidence to minimise trial-and-error decision-making.

Virtual laboratories can be very useful for evaluating policies and investments before they are put into effect. The key question for decision-makers is where to invest for maximum benefit and minimal harm. Computer transport can help answer this question.

These models can calculate changes in traffic, cycling uptake and emissions before infrastructure is built. They have traditionally been used to build business cases for infrastructure investment.

However, these models have often neglected cycling. The result is a lack of quantitative, case-specific evidence to support investment decisions on cycling infrastructure.

That’s why we developed the Transport Health Assessment Tools for and . The results show the health benefits of walking and cycling.

4. Plan with a focus on cycling

Australia will have to do more than set up a to get to net zero. Electric vehicles soon. Transport produces about a but its share is , becoming the by 2030.

Cycling offers transport that’s almost free, sustainable, time-efficient and healthy. Walking and cycling are no-brainer options to get to net zero sooner.

We can measure basic walkability across neighbourhoods, but where is the connected urban policy support for cycling? We need academics, policymakers and cycling advocates to work together on these problems.

It would be great to see “bicycle mayors” such as in our cities. Places like the and give priority to cycling through planning policies and infrastructure such as bike paths and dedicated cycle lanes. The result is high rates of cycling, including , women and older people who are considered more vulnerable road users.

Australian rates of cycling for transport are dismally low. There’s also a huge .

5. Make active transport a funding priority

Government infrastructure policies prioritise large, costly road megaprojects, such as . They entrench many harms of car use, including carbon emissions and other pollution, and displace more active and sustainable forms of travel.

By comparison, walking and cycling infrastructure is cheap and small scale. But to get the greatest benefit it must be broadly spread and connected. We need comprehensive cycling infrastructure plans for our cities that put cycling projects ahead of megaroads for funding.

The federal budget provided an extra $3.2 billion for the over-budget North East Link in Victoria. It announced $100 million for a and a national approach to .

Halting or deferring funding for massive road projects could free up enough money to transform metropolitan cycling networks. That would support a shift away from cars, creating savings as road projects could be deferred or cancelled.

6. Connect cycling to long-term health benefits

A lack of safe cycling infrastructure denies vulnerable road users the use of this sustainable and healthy transport. This has a long-term and compounding effect: if people don’t take up cycling when young it translates into fewer adult cyclists later. They miss out on being physically active through cycling and its life-long health benefits.

Cycling improves physical and mental health. Some studies suggest cyclists are . There’s an incentive for employers to support cycling – even .

Cycling also by improving their health, social wellbeing and academic performance.

For all these reasons, cycling is an undervalued mode of transport that needs urgent support. It’s critical for healthy, sustainable and liveable cities of the future.

Melanie Davern receives funding from the ARC, NHMRC and The Ian Potter Foundation, which is funding the Australian Urban Observatory AI research project.

Afshin Jafari receives funding from VicHealth, iMOVE, and The Ian Potter Foundation, which is funding the Australian Urban Observatory AI research project.

Alan Both receives funding from VicHealth, iMOVE, NHMRC and The Ian Potter Foundation, which is funding the Australian Urban Observatory AI research project.

RMIT University receives funding from the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute to support Jago Dodson’s research.

Lucy Gunn receives funding from the ARC, NHMRC and The Ian Potter Foundation, which is funding the Australian Urban Observatory AI research project.

Qian (Chayn) Sun receives funding from ARC, AURIN and The Ian Potter Foundation, which is funding the Australian Urban Observatory AI research project.